As much as I love the Star Wars D6 system, there are things
in it that require explanation/rationalization as to why they are
so—explanation beyond simply ‘game balance mechanics’. Or at least they do for
me. If a player asks me ‘why is this like this?” I like to have some kind of
answer for them.
What I’ll be talking about in this post in particular are
the combined mechanics of vehicle-scale weapon damage and fire control. Damage
is pretty self explanatory—the damage the weapon dishes out. The more powerful
it is, the more it does. Fire control represents an ‘assisted aiming’ system
that most vehicle-scale weapons have—the weapon’s ‘targeting computer’, if you
will.
We’ll start with damage—but before we do, I want to gloss
over the whole problem D6 has with wildly varying stats. For instance, a basic
‘laser cannon’ is listed in various Star Warssource materials as doing anywhere
from 1D to 5D damage. This seems to have no rhyme or reason to it—it was simply
a number picked by whoever authored the source in question. For the purposes of
moving this discussion forward, I’ve come up with my own ‘rules’ for standard
damage per weapon type. Here is a brief example:
A ‘blaster cannon’ is lighter than a laser cannon and does
3D damage
A ‘laser cannon’ is the standard vehicle weapon and does 4D
damage
A ‘heavy laser cannon’ is heavier (duh) than the standard
and does 5D Damage
I like the symmetry here between vehicle scale weapons and
character scale weapons. For instance, the standard blaster pistol does 4D character
scale damage; the standard laser cannon does 4D vehicle-scale.
At this point, the system seems to work. Where the ‘wrinkle’
comes in is when you have ‘fire-linked’ weapons. For instance, the 2 laser
cannons used by the TIE fighter. Logically, one might assume that if two 4D
weapons are fired simultaneously, the resulting damage would be 8D. Yet, the
stats in all of the sourcebooks list the damage of a ‘dual laser cannon’ as 5D.
Just 1D higher than a single cannon. Similarly, the Falcon’s ‘quad laser
cannon’ does not do 16D (4x4D), but ‘only’ 6D.
How to explain this…
The best that I have come up with is that ‘linked’ weapons
do NOT fire simultaneously, but rather alternate to keep up a higher sustained
rate of fire that a single weapon can not. Thus, a craft hit by a dual laser
cannon isn’t (necessarily) hit by both blasts every time- but odds are you’re
going to do more damage when you hit. Maybe one hit is square, and the other is
just a graze, or maybe both blasts hit, but both are grazing shots. The D6
system is very abstract when it comes to damage anyway, meaning that a bad
damage roll already DOES indicate a ‘grazing’ shot, while a good roll indicates
a more solid hit. Thus (I feel), the adding of a D or two of damage helps
reflect this AND keeps damage rolls in game balance’.
My general rule for this is as follows:
A ‘single’ weapon does its base damage
(example, a laser cannon does 4D)
A ‘dual’ weapon does its base damage + 1D
(example, a dual laser cannon does 5D)
A ‘triple’ weapon does its base damage +1D+2
(example a triple laser cannon does 5D+2)
A ‘quad’ weapon does its base damage +2D
(example, a quad laser cannon does 6D)
I also feel rather ‘justified’ in this explanation by what
we see in the films. Weapons DO seem to alternate their fire. TIE cannons
alternate. X-Wings seem to fire their lasers in sequence. The Falcon’s quad
guns fire 2 x 2, etc.
Now, all this having been said, how does Fire Control fit
into all of this? Well, I am of the opinion that Fire Control is NOT just the
targeting computers on the ship, but also a factor of the rate of fire that
vehicle weapons put out. In vehicle combat- particularly ‘dogfighting’- it is
VERY difficult to hit a moving target. This is why cannons mounted on modern
aircraft are of the ‘automatic’ variety. They fire a ‘stream’ of rounds at an
enemy in order to increase their chances of hitting with a few of those round.
The same is shown in the Star Wars films.
So, for me, the fire-control of a vehicle is part computer,
part rate of fire. Say your average TIE fighter has a fire-control rating of
2D. In my opinion, 1D of that would be the actual assistance of the computer,
the other 1D would be from the ‘burst fire’ effect. A vehicle with a 1D fire
control would have only a basic target computer and rely almost entirely on the
burst effect to help them hit targets. A vehicle with a 3D fire control would
rely more on its computers (providing 2D) and less on its burst effect (which
still just provides 1D). This has no actual effect on the mechanics of the
system—you would never roll 1D for computer then 1D for burst effect, but I do
like to THINK of the system in this manner.
Also, if you consider that burst effect and want to add some
more depth to your vehicle combat system, you could allow different fire modes
on weapons that could alter both the weapon damage and fire-control. This is a
concept I always enjoyed in the old X-Wing and TIE Fighter video games.
In these games, if you had a craft with dual weapons you
could switch between the standard alternating shot to a ‘dual fire’ mode, where
both weapons fired at the same time. The effect in the game was that your rate
of fire dropped (it took longer between shots for both weapons to recharge) and
with it your chances of landing a shot, but when (if) you hit, you did more
damage. With a quad-firing weapon (such as an X-Wing or TIE interceptor) you
actually had 3 fire modes. The ‘standard’ was firing alternating pairs of
weapons. But you could also switch to a mode where each laser fired individually,
in turn. This upped your rate of fire (and chances to hit), but lowered the
damage when you hit). Likewise, you could switch all four weapons to fire
simultaneously. This resulted in a very slow rate of fire, less chances to hit,
but more damage if you did hit solidly.
In game terms, this could work simply as follows:
For dual-weapons:
Alternating Mode (standard): Damage normal; Fire Control
Normal
Dual-Mode: Damage +1D; Fire Control -1D
For triple-weapons:
Alternating Mode (standard): Damage normal; Fire Control
Normal
Triple-Mode: Damage +1D; Fire Control -1D
For quad-weapons:
Alternating Mode (standard): Damage normal; Fire Control
Normal
Single-Mode: Damage -1D; Fire Control +1D
Quad-Mode: Damage +1D; Fire Control -1D
No comments:
Post a Comment